This morning's thoughts on Foreign Talent and Democracy in Singapore:
Foreign Talent
I thought this topic was talked dead. But yesterday night after a lovely dinner at Racecourse Road, I was directed to something particularly well-written by a girl my age about recent immigrants in Singapore and I couldn't help feeling that we are ignoring an important point.
The political leaders in this country often cite 'natural resource constraints, hostile neighbours and multi-racialism' as the underlying rationale for some necessary policies. I don't think this reasoning works anymore. We panic whenever dangers of 'natural resource constraints, hostile neighbours and multi-racialism' are emblazoned across the front page of the Straits Times. This insecurity leads us to become fearful, jealous and blindly discriminatory. We form unapologetic prejudices according to race, income, education certificates, nationality.
The issue is framed as such - tension between the necessity of foregn labour/talent, and local job scarcity. The answer has always been 'the necessity of the economy is more important than the social necessity of local household income'. Singapore has consistently picked economy over society for the last 44 years, but individuals are beginning to frustrate. I see disparate pockets of opposition building up across all classes in our country. This equation no longer supports policy, and I attempt an overlooked, lasting and potentially socially harmonious solution - We are a multi-racial society. What? You say you've heard this before.
No, what you have heard before is that as an explosive multi-racial society we need to feed our economy in order to preserve peace, therefore economic concerns always trump. But when I say 'We are are a multi-racial society' I mean look where your parents came from, where your grandparents came from. We are a multi-racial society precisely because we are an immigrant society. Do we really dare say that we lay more claim to the resources and opportunities in this land simply because our lineage has been physically located here for a couple of years more than 'new immigrants'? Dare we stake our citizenship superiority claim upon our political and social contribution to our neighbourhood and country? To discriminate against foreign-passport-holders (I feel uneasy even using the word foreigners) is to discriminate against yourself and your grandparents. To hate anyone speaking a Bengali, Thai, Italian, Mandarin, Spanish is to hate your grandparents who cannot speak fluent English.
Sure, there are many people who are using Singapore to lily-pad to selfish accomplishments. Those should be hated for using and abusing our country, then giving nothing back. But there are surely more Singapore-passport-holders who mumble the pledge and take education subsidies for granted, never contribute to country, and spend all their free hours in our clean parks and city facilities planning escape to another country. Contribution evaluation is not going to help.
What we need to recognise is that people reciprocate. The worse we treat the guests in this country, the less they are going to act like family. Can we blame them? We are going to end up in a web of jealousy, arrogance, and self-sabotage. This hypocrisy must stop.
Uniquely Singapore - it has taken me years to understand what this feeble sounding catchphrase meant to communicate. Yet this is what I understand of it today. It is far easier for Singapore to become a welcoming city of the world than any other city of the same economic development. We are arguably the most multi-racial first-class developed city in the world. Do you realise how amazing that is? Other cities, London, Hong Kong, NYC, Tokyo, Zurich all started with far more homogenous populations, and some are still more homogenous in culture, philosophy and policy than Singapore. While other cities struggle to integrate wildly different new people into their homogenous societies, heavy with history, it is
easy for us to be accepting and accommodating. Don't waste that.
Democracy
I also want to say something about social Enlightenment and economic growth. This country brings its children up to believe in the triumph of the free-market and its eventual ability to transform civil society. And for a while I have been similarly lulled into sitting back and waiting for our unhurried, smooth, graceful transition to individual freedoms and equality. But look at how much wealth the Middle East nations have, and how much inequality their constitution shelters. Singaporeans cannot sit back and allow the government to plan for 20 years of excruciatingly slow democratic reform, we have to want it for ourselves. Money does not make morals, and economy does not create society. We cannot wait for them to tell us we are ready, when they think that we are ready, because this is growing up. You are not grown up until you can stand up and say for yourself that you are grown up. We can have no freedom and no identity until we claim them for ourselves.